We help organisations shape the
IT systems that cannot afford to fail.

Systems where availability, performance and compliance aren’t footnotes in the spec — they’re the foundation.

What make us different

Whatever the role, we have the specialist

Business-critical projects tend to need more than one competence, often at the same time. We cover the full development lifecycle at senior level: developers, system architects, test managers, business analysts, rollout leads and deployment managers. When a project calls for a specific role, we have the right person for it.

We notice what the spec doesn’t say

Non-functional requirements rarely appear in full on the spec. A line like “the system must be GDPR-compliant” can account for a significant portion of the project budget if it is not identified and priced from the start. We work through these requirements systematically before they become unplanned costs.

Track records, not titles

Our consultants carry long, solid backgrounds in their fields. When we place a specialist, you get someone who has been in production environments, handled real constraints, and knows what the cost of getting it wrong looks like. We are selective about who represents us, and we stand behind every recommendation we make.

Work that shapes operations

HEALTHCARE

Major international healthcare provider

A clinic management platform for a large international healthcare provider with clinics across multiple countries. The system needed to perform reliably at remote locations connected to central infrastructure across long distances.

MANUFACTURING

Global food processing and packaging manufacturer

A production management system controlling manufacturing processes across 25 factories worldwide, running around the clock with no tolerance for unplanned downtime.

TRADE COMPLIANCE

Customs management system

Business and operational lead on replacing a legacy customs management system with a new SAP-based solution, ensuring continuity and user adoption across the organisation.

Some of the people behind the work

Max Haventon, Senior Consultant

Max Haventon — Senior Developer / Solution Architect

Developer and project manager specialising in Java/JEE production systems for global manufacturing. Has worked across architecture, development and technical project management throughout a long career in mission-critical factory environments. Works with maintenance and new development.
Christer Svensson, Senior Consultant

Christer Svensson, Senior Architect

Senior solution architect with more than 20 years designing and delivering large-scale enterprise systems. Combines deep backend and integration expertise with cross-domain architecture leadership, spanning cloud-native platforms, SAP implementations and major global retail transformation programmes.
Magnus Borgström, Senior Consultant

Magnus Borgström — Senior Android Developer / Solution Architect

Senior Android developer and solution architect with experience across consumer applications, banking and healthcare. Works across the full Android development lifecycle, from architecture and API integration to performance-focused delivery. BankID, Kotlin and Jetpack Compose specialist.
Marcus Björk, Senior Consultant

Marcus Björk — Senior Developer

Senior developer and tech lead with extensive experience in .NET, Azure and e-commerce. Works across full stack development, system architecture and API design, with a background spanning retail, enterprise system catalogues and public sector services.

Insights from the field

Managing requirements as system properties
Standard requirements methods work well for functional requirements. Non-functional requirements such as performance, compliance and usability work better when treated as properties of the solution rather than tasks to decompose.
Read More
The refactoring safety net
Unit tests that know too much about implementation details become a burden during refactoring, not a safety net. Mattias Olofsson explains how black box testing keeps that net intact as the codebase changes.
Read More
Our approach to regulatory requirements
Breaking compliance requirements into sub-requirements leads to fragmented solutions and makes audits harder. IT informa developed a different approach: treat regulatory requirements as properties of the solution, tested across healthcare, finance and supply chains.
Read More

Working on something critical?

Looking for your next mission?

Scroll to Top